Crime and Precedent for Evans and Koroma
| Category: Penn State Football | 3 Comments
“How in the world can Joe Paterno play people that have been charged with a crime? This shouldn’t happen. He needs to set a precedent.” - September 30, 2008
What precedent should Joe Paterno be setting? Are you suggesting that any player charged with any crime should be banned from playing football ever again?
Maurice Evans and Abe Koroma did serve a three game suspension. Don’t you think that’s sufficient for the crime… in this case being charged with possession of a small amount of marijuana? (Also remember that here in the United States of America, those charged have not yet been convicted. Luckily, everybody here is innocent until proven guilty…. right?)
From a friend quite familiar with the law: “The whole point of the criminal system is that it punishes those charged/convicted of crimes. Just because they are football players does not mean they should be doubly punished (criminal sanctions like a fine/community service AND no longer allowed to do their passion). Taking it into the real world, assume that someone is an avid runner that was charged with marijuana possession. Would we say, okay, you must pay the fine and do community service, but you also can never run again? No, it doesn’t make sense.”
Trust me. I don’t think Paterno has been right in the way that he’s handled every situation. Anwar Phillips probably shouldn’t have played in the 2003 Capital One Bowl after being charged with aggrivated sexual assault and expelled from the university in late 2002.
In this case, however, the punishment fit the crime. It’s time for Evans and Koroma to be back on the field.

